Iran Election Guide

Donate to EAWV





Or, click to learn more

Search

« Turkey & Israel: Clashes over Iran, Lebanon, Gaza...and a TV Show | Main | Iran & Social Media: Dispelling Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (Parsons) »
Tuesday
Jan122010

Middle East Arms Triangle: The US, "Moderate" Arabs, & Israel

On 6 January, we reported that the Netanyahu government had concerns over Washington's sale of about $6 billion of arms to four "moderate" Arab states (Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and the United Arab Emirates) and Washington. We asked whether the Israelis were pursuing  the complaint to argue the argument that the regional balance of power would collapse because of the arms shipments, regardless of how "moderate" the Arabs states are.

The background to the current manoeuvres lies in Israel's concerns over a $20 billion arms deal between Saudi Arabia and the George W. Bush Administration. On that occasion, Tel Aviv used its concerns as leverage to receive advanced F-35 fighter jets and to limit American arms sales to Lebanon amidst the re-emergence of Hezbollah. So far, no arms deal with Israel have been signed under Obama, and there is the issue of  shipment of higher-tech arms under the 2007 Memorandum of Understanding, which promised $30 billion to Tel Aviv over the following 10 years.

In that context, perhaps the immediate postures over the US-Arab deals should situated under the US-Israel strategic relationship. The Jewish Daily Forward has noted:
Leaders in Washington and Jerusalem have publicly locked horns over the issue of West Bank settlements. And Israeli public opinion has largely viewed America’s new administration as unfriendly. But behind the scenes, strategic security relations between the two countries are flourishing.

Reader Comments (5)

[...] the example here: Middle East Arms Triangle: The US, “Moderate” Arabs, & Zion … Share and [...]

Obama admin. wants the Saudis to secure their border with Yemen.

January 12, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterDave

Ali, why do you use "Tel Aviv" instead of "Jerusalem"? Regardless of your personal opinions, the Israeli leadership is situated in Jerusalem.

January 12, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterYonatan Amir

Yonatan,

For two basic reasons. First of all, the status of Jerusalem is still under discussion. Secondly, most countries in the world, including United States, see Jerusalem as a disputed city, waiting to be resolved trough negotiations.

So, it is not personal.

January 12, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterAli Yenidunya

The status of Eastern Jerusalem is under discussion. Western Jerusalem, which includes the Knesset and government offices, is as "disputed" as Tel-Aviv.

January 12, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterYonatan Amir

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>