Thursday
May212009
  
  
  
  Pot-Kettle-Black Moment of the Day: Karl Rove on "Credibility" and Torture
 Thursday, May 21, 2009 at 11:13
Thursday, May 21, 2009 at 11:13  Karl Rove, The Washington Post, 21 May 2009: "The kerfluffle over House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's CIA briefing on enhanced interrogation matters a lot. First, there's the question of credibility."
Karl Rove, The Washington Post, 21 May 2009: "The kerfluffle over House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's CIA briefing on enhanced interrogation matters a lot. First, there's the question of credibility."The Question of Credibility: Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction and Link to 9-11. The Suspended Hunt for Osama bin Laden. Federal Budget Deficits. The Firing of Justice Department Prosecutors on Political Grounds. Katrina.
George W. Bush, 7 November 2005: "We do not torture."
tagged   George W Bush,
George W Bush,   Karl Rove,
Karl Rove,   Nancy Pelosi,
Nancy Pelosi,   Torture  in
Torture  in   US Politics
US Politics  
      
     George W Bush,
George W Bush,   Karl Rove,
Karl Rove,   Nancy Pelosi,
Nancy Pelosi,   Torture  in
Torture  in   US Politics
US Politics  







 I have consciously avoided all comment on the furour --- whipped up by former Bush Administration officials and their supporters --- over how much Nancy Pelosi (pictured), the Democratic Speaker of the House of Representatives, knew about the torture programme from 2002. I have done so not out of political bias or a lack of academic interest (for example, the limits on Congress' oversight of illegal activity when an exclusive group of 4 or 8 legislators are given some information --- and thus sworn to secrecy --- over that activity). I have done so because this is a blatant attempt by those who served Bush to deflect attention from their actions.
I have consciously avoided all comment on the furour --- whipped up by former Bush Administration officials and their supporters --- over how much Nancy Pelosi (pictured), the Democratic Speaker of the House of Representatives, knew about the torture programme from 2002. I have done so not out of political bias or a lack of academic interest (for example, the limits on Congress' oversight of illegal activity when an exclusive group of 4 or 8 legislators are given some information --- and thus sworn to secrecy --- over that activity). I have done so because this is a blatant attempt by those who served Bush to deflect attention from their actions.