Iran Election Guide

Donate to EAWV





Or, click to learn more

Search

Entries in Mohsen Fakhrizadeh (3)

Thursday
Aug302012

The Latest from Iran (30 August): The Big Names Arrive at the Non-Aligned Summit

Former Iranian President Hashemi Rafsanjani, United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon, and Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi at the summit of the Non-Aligned Movement this morning

See also Iran Document: The Supreme Leader's Speech to the Summit of the Non-Aligned Movement
The Latest from Iran (29 August): Side-Stepping Syria at the Summit


1630 GMT: Summit Watch. We have already noted that Iranian media have censored Egyptian President Morsi's remarks on Syria (see 1520 GMT). Now it appears that outlets are re-writing the speech....

Khabar Online claims that Morsi issued a warning of "sedition" against the Syrian people and said all should hope that the "popular" regime remains in power.

There is also scepticism over the headline of Fars that Morsi, soon after his provocative statement at the Non-Aligned Movement's summit criticising "bloodshed" in Syria and supporting the opposition to the "oppressive" regime, "Egypt Thinks of Iran as a Strategic Partner".

Click to read more ...

Saturday
Mar242012

Iran Propaganda Special: US Officials Spin Away from War

On Friday, Reuters published a significant article by Tabassum Zakaria and Mark Hosenball, "Intel Shows Iran Nuclear Threat Not Imminent".

The significance, however, is not in the "Intel": the information in the article is far from new. What is significant is that, in the battle amongst US officials to set the agenda over Iran, that information has not only resurfaced but has gained the upper hand.

The media spin has shifted. Iran is no longer an imminent threat. Although it should still be watched, Tehran is not approaching the Obama "red line" --- the pursuit of the Bomb --- which would bring Washington's endorsement of a strike on Iranian facilities.


Special Report: Intel Shows Iran Nuclear Threat Not Imminent
Tabassum Zakaria and Mark Hosenball

The United States, European allies and even Israel generally agree on three things about Iran's nuclear program: Tehran does not have a bomb, has not decided to build one, and is probably years away from having a deliverable nuclear warhead.

For months, the analysis that "Tehran does not have a bomb, has not decided to build one, and is probably years away from having a deliverable nuclear warhead", put forward in the 2007 National Intelligence Estimate, had been pushed aside. Instead --- partly because of pressure from Congress, partly because of its own drive for tough sanctions --- the Administration had used compliant reporters to put out the spectre of an imminent Iranian threat.

This was just a spectre: there has little if any information since 2007 pointing to a resumption of a militarised Iranian programme. However, politics ruled the day in the presentation of the nuclear issue.

And that is still the case. What changed, with respect to Zakaria and Hosenball, was not some breakthrough of investigative journalism. Rather, key members in the Obama Adminisration, including the President, began to worry that an Israeli attack might become a reality rather than a perpetual warning. And some officials are also seeking a deal with Tehran over the nuclear issue, or at least accepting the resumption of talks.

So the media spin has shifted. Iran is no longer an imminent threat. Although it should still be watched, Tehran is not approaching the Obama "red line" --- the pursuit of the Bomb --- which would bring Washington's endorsement of a strike on Iranian facilities.

Click to read more ...

Wednesday
Nov092011

Iran Special Analysis (Part 1): The Nuclear Report --- "May" Is Not "Definitely"

Let's start with the "smoking gun" statement from the IAEA that does not exactly smoke: 

Prior to the end of 2003....activities [which may be related to a militarised nuclear effort] took place under a structured programme. There are also indications that some activities relevant to the development of a nuclear explosive device continued after 2003, and that some may still be ongoing. 

"May" is not definitely. In the analogy of the BBC's Paul Danahar, drawing from the language of a Reuters report, "If the answer to the question 'Do you think she likes me?' was 'strong indications that she might possibly", I would not be off to buy a ring."

But let's examine "may" in the context of the IAEA's 15-page annex, which in the spin of unnamed officials to media this week, became "definitely".

Click to read more ...